by Ana Montano.
The new building technology of the industrial era, the invention of the elevator and the structural steel framework, made possible the rise of skyscrapers, particularly in central business districts within growing cities. The skyscraper came to symbolize the growing economy and efficiency in their usage, by large corporations, as processing centers. These factors along with rise in the urban population and the continual expansion of the American city created a building boom for skyscrapers, whose typology was changed by the invention and introduction of air conditioning as part of its mechanical system.
Primarily associated with industries and their factories, air conditioning saw a prospect client in the office building, whose conditioning of people as opposed to materials and machines expressed concern for the comfort of the workers just as much as their efficiency. These information-‐processing centers became the spaces for the standardization of work, where “efficiency” became the feature of the office building typology and air conditioning its provider. I would hypothesize that the correlation between the conditioning of workers as machines and building form in its spatial organization is their construction of the workplace as an environment, mechanized through air conditioning.
The system in a skyscraper was not seen as a utility, like electricity, due to companies like Carrier who sold their system’s implementation within office buildings as an investment. It then became associated with the design of the building, not aesthetically, but through new considerations it presented architects, owners, managers, and engineers. It not only allowed the architect to abandon passive solar heating and cooling design approaches in search for new forms, but created new issues to consider due to its consumption of valuable floor space and its cost as a budget expense not being used for the actual design of the building. New elements that arose that became an integral part of the system were mechanical rooms, ductwork, machines, radiators, grills, all which replaced previous concerns over cross ventilation and natural daylight, that guided the building typology in its early years.
Office managers and owners feared their buildings obsolesce due to the skyscraper construction boom that made the competition for tenants rely increasingly on central city locations and low rental prices. Carrier sought solutions by presenting the benefits of investing in air conditioning to attract and keep tenants. The concurrent demands of air conditioning in office buildings and air conditioning providers induced Carrier to sell this aspect of air conditioning in a manner that became increasingly technical and quantitative. As a manufacturer, it presented itself not only as the first air conditioning company, a point thoroughly emphasized in the promotion of their services, but sought a way to remediate the system’s cost with technical and methodical computations that would ultimately validate not only the company, but the system itself, an its value as profit rather than as an expense.
All the factors that made tall office buildings possible, new building technologies and typologies, along with the business management principles of Taylorism occur simultaneously although never presented from the perspective of manufactured weather. Air conditioning’s presence in these spaces and the rise of the International style in the 1920s and 30s marked the shift in emphasis of environmental passive design to form and the maximization of floor space. The exhibition that coined the term International style was the first architectural exhibition held at the Museum of Modern art. Interestingly enough, this new interest in architecture with the rise of this style, which relied heavily in form, was new, unique and unprecedented. It emerged in part due to the skyscraper, which discarded masonry and mass and instead used the steel frame to express volume allowing air
conditioning and its system to take foreground in the office space. Carrier made its way to the foreground by expressing their system’s ability to control the weather rather than simply cool it and emphasizing its ability to promote efficiency as opposed to simply comfort.
“The aim of Hitchcock and Johnson was to define a style that would encapsulate this modern architecture, doing this by the inclusion of specific architects.” However, I believe the International Style also defined this by the inclusion of air conditioning within its walls. George and William Lescaze’s PSFS Building, built for the Philadelphia Savings Fund Society, was selected by Hitchcock and Johnson for display at the exhibition Modern Architecture – International Exhibition and coincidentally happened to be both the first International style skyscraper in the United States as well as the second high rise in the country to be equipped with air conditioning. These disperse but interrelated factors revolving around the tall office building are for the first time housed in the same building that became the resultant expression of the relations that made the building the icon it was then and is now. Air conditioning both literally and figurative became the last piece to be placed in the system, and without its presence then, the building may not have achieved its necessary appraisal to attract tenants and prevent its obsolescence.
For image captions and credits, please see the associated spreadsheet.
Bibliography
Bailey, George R. “How Air Conditioning Affects Design of Today’s Skyscraper.” Heating, Piping Air Conditioning (1949): 69-‐71. Print.
Carrier Corporation Records Center.
Chapman, Hal. “The Value of Air Conditioning in Renting Skyscraper Space.” Refrigerating Engineering 3 (1937). Print
C-‐Lab, . Is This Not a Pipe? Volume #37: ed. New York: Stichting Archis, 2013. 40-‐53. Web. Feb. 2014.
Larry Ford, Cities and Buildings: Skyscrapers, Skid Rows, and Suburbs (Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994), Ch. 1, “Downtown Buildings,” 10 -‐ 63
Raymond A. Mohl, The New City: Urban America in the Industrial Age, 1860-‐1920 (Arlington Heights IL: Harlan Davidson, 1985): Chapters 2 and 3, pp. 27-‐66.
Schultz, Eric B. 2012. Weathermakers to the World Farmington: Carrier Corporation.
For more images, please visit:
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0BzxPj_7hPUSQNEFvcGdCTHFNOFk&usp=sharing